Hey Ray Akins,
I haven’t said anything up until now because I do not know Rusty Hight plus I checked your documentation out and it lines up with some things I have heard. But I will tell you right now you are a bold faced liar about Delia Sellers and Melody Gilmore. I am not a Democrat and I am not a Republican but I do consider myself friends of them both and they would NEVER, you hear me RAY AKINS, NEVER do anything illegal or unethical.
I know for a fact Delia Sellers is not breaking any election laws. I also know for a fact that Melody Gilmore does no “8 o’clock favors” for local attorneys. You know what you are ray Akins, a rotten low down liar. You know something BIG FAT LIAR I actually know a great deal about the court system and I do believe Judge Hight and District Attorney Little are giving you “special treatment”, BUT YOU DESERVE IT.
Why don’t you take this sorry bunch of lies about my friends and commit cyber suicide? Yes, you are all into Judge Hight’s suicide attempt a few years ago and I guess you are saying he is some kind of nut because of it, SO WHAT ABOUT THIS CRAZY SUICIDE ATTEMPT OF YOURS WHERE YOU ATTACK THE PROSECUTOR THAT HOLDS YOUR LIFE IN HIS HANDS. You are the nut! No one should believe you about Delia and Melody just because you my be right on this other stuff.
I bet you want print this Mr. Big Shot. I bet you are too chicken to post when a woman challenges your integrity. I-dineout nd KSHN have your number and you are ruined in this county.
Signed,
Wouldn’t you like to know
TWO CLERKS, TWO PROBLEMS
Dear Liberty Dispatch,
I never cease to be amazed at what goes on in our courthouse. I am often left with my mouth left wide open with not only how things appear and the idea of treating people equally and fair, but questioning whether something is legal or not.
Two things this week alone fall in that category and should be of interest to voters in Liberty County. The first one is the stunning violation of the election code by County Clerk Delia Sellers. A newly elected County clerk on their first day in office would know better than to pull the partisan stunt Sellers is pulling. In order to help Democrats, Sellers is allowing the Alternate Election Judge pick clerks. It seems now that Sellers’ Democratic party does not have oversight of most of the election precincts, she has become so politically driven she has re-interpreted the election code. Sellers knew clerks were chosen by the Election Judge when Democrats were the Election Judges, but now that Republicans are in charge of much of the oversight (and Sellers is a candidate on the ballot) she has decided to make up some new laws of her own. Democrat, Lee Groce does not seem to object – of course his name is on the ballot too.
The second amazing thing from the courthouse this week was District Clerk Melanie Gilmore publicly admitting that she uses her office to do favors for certain lawyers at 8:00 o’clock at night. That does not sound legal to me, but if it is, it certainly does not sound fair or even-handed. If some lawyers can have a few extra hours to get their documents filed by meeting Gilmore at the courthouse in the middle of the night and others can’t, I think that is unacceptable. The District Clerk may have been trying to brag about working long hours when she admitted this and said her job is 24 hours a day, 7 days a week – but in a courthouse which has had scandal after scandal after scandal, I must wonder what all she might be doing with the district court records that she could not do in the 'light' of day.
Delia Sellers and Melanie Gilmore may be real sweet ladies, I don’t know. But I do know as a taxpayer I expect more professionalism. And I expect for things to not only be done properly and legally, but I expect them to be done with no appearance of impropriety. The integrity of our courts and our legal system is important to this community. In order to improve our system, I will vote to clean out the people who are running it and vote in new people. I have meet Donna Brown and Paulette Williams and feel like they are both smart, honest people. Now is a good time for a fresh start!
Listen to the attached public comment from Liberty County District Clerk, Melanie Gilmore.
I never cease to be amazed at what goes on in our courthouse. I am often left with my mouth left wide open with not only how things appear and the idea of treating people equally and fair, but questioning whether something is legal or not.
Two things this week alone fall in that category and should be of interest to voters in Liberty County. The first one is the stunning violation of the election code by County Clerk Delia Sellers. A newly elected County clerk on their first day in office would know better than to pull the partisan stunt Sellers is pulling. In order to help Democrats, Sellers is allowing the Alternate Election Judge pick clerks. It seems now that Sellers’ Democratic party does not have oversight of most of the election precincts, she has become so politically driven she has re-interpreted the election code. Sellers knew clerks were chosen by the Election Judge when Democrats were the Election Judges, but now that Republicans are in charge of much of the oversight (and Sellers is a candidate on the ballot) she has decided to make up some new laws of her own. Democrat, Lee Groce does not seem to object – of course his name is on the ballot too.
The second amazing thing from the courthouse this week was District Clerk Melanie Gilmore publicly admitting that she uses her office to do favors for certain lawyers at 8:00 o’clock at night. That does not sound legal to me, but if it is, it certainly does not sound fair or even-handed. If some lawyers can have a few extra hours to get their documents filed by meeting Gilmore at the courthouse in the middle of the night and others can’t, I think that is unacceptable. The District Clerk may have been trying to brag about working long hours when she admitted this and said her job is 24 hours a day, 7 days a week – but in a courthouse which has had scandal after scandal after scandal, I must wonder what all she might be doing with the district court records that she could not do in the 'light' of day.
Delia Sellers and Melanie Gilmore may be real sweet ladies, I don’t know. But I do know as a taxpayer I expect more professionalism. And I expect for things to not only be done properly and legally, but I expect them to be done with no appearance of impropriety. The integrity of our courts and our legal system is important to this community. In order to improve our system, I will vote to clean out the people who are running it and vote in new people. I have meet Donna Brown and Paulette Williams and feel like they are both smart, honest people. Now is a good time for a fresh start!
Listen to the attached public comment from Liberty County District Clerk, Melanie Gilmore.
Liberty County Justice?
Dear Liberty Dispatch:
My name is John E. Stockton and I am a resident of San Jacinto County, Texas. I would like to tell you of my experience with Judge C.T. (Rusty) Hight and his 75th District Court of Liberty County, Texas.
In September 2003 I was sued in the 75th District Court in Liberty County by the law firm of Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson, with Judge C.T. Hight presiding. Before the trial Judge Hight said he was considering recusing himself from the trial because of his relationship with E.R. (Ed) Norwood, one of the lawyers for the firm. Unfortunately for me Judge Hight did not recuse himself. He and Ed Norwood are life-long friends, having attended the same grade school, high school and college. During the trial a lawyer in the courtroom asked Judge Hight how he likes being judge. Judge Hight replied, I was two or three years away from being ready but I ran for judge to get it before some Republican got appointed.
I was sued for not paying attorney fees from a law suit in which I was the plaintiff and Ed Norwood was my attorney. In that suit I was quoted a fee of $25,000 t0 $30,000 by Ed Norwood for representation by his firm. After the trial I was billed for approximately $400,000, more than ten times what I was quoted. The judge, C.T., E.R. Norwood and other lawyers involved knew that I was in my seventies, living on social security and had very little cash. In a hearing before the trial Judge Hight took away my rights by not allowing me to ask for attorney fees or seek damages, such as deceptive trade practice, for having been charged many times the fee quoted by Ed Norwood.
Although I live in San Jacinto County, Judge Hight would not allow the trial to be in my home county. If he had allowed the trial to be in San Jacinto County, taxpayers in Liberty County would have saved a lot of money, but he would not have been able to help his friend, Ed Norwood. In a hearing before the trial Judge Hight said, “I believe in a lawyer getting all he’s got coming”.
During the trial it was brought out that I had been illegally charged over $62,000 for the services of David Ripkowski, a paralegal for the firm Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson. The firm was paying Mr. Ripkowski around $20 per hour for his services but charging me $90 an hour for his services-more than three times the cost. When it was determined in trial this could not be allowed, Judge Hight told Ed Norwood, “Don’t worry Ed; I’ll see that you get your money”. And he did.
Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson hired another lawyer named Mike Johnston, for a fee of $325 an hour, who also attended the same grade school, high school and law school as Judge Hight and Ed Norwood. Mr. Johnson, E.R. Norwood, Michael Sanders and Scott Camp all were untruthful during the trial and misled the jury. (Martha Stewart went to jail for being untruthful) Judge C.T. Hight knew these lawyers were not telling the truth and yet he did nothing about it. (Perjury)
E.R. Norwood told me before he could get anything he wanted in the 75th District court, saying that it was his “turf”. The jury did NOT award Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson what they sought in the trial. Approximately two weeks after the trial Judge C. T. Hight overturned the jury’s decision and awarded the firm many thousands of dollars-money that I did not have. Being in my 70’s and living on Social Security, I had to sell my best cows and the best part of my ranch to pay over $300,000 to Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson even though they had quoted me $25,000 to $30,000. It is no wonder judges and lawyers are concerned about their safety.
Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson charged thousands of dollars to my bill for Ed Norwood attending a board of directors meeting the firm held in Midland, TX. This certainly was not discussed with me nor approved by me, but I still had to pay for it because Judge C. T. Hight believes a lawyer should get everything he’s got coming. It is my experience and my opinion that some judges and the Texas Bar Association protect greedy, dishonest lawyers and assist them in taking from the honest and the elderly. If I lived in Liberty County I would not serve jury duty in a courtroom over which Judge C.T. Hight presided.
As of now, October 2010, I have not collect one cent on what Ed Norwood and Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson claim they won in trial for me, yet I have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees for it.
If Judge Hight and his cronies will bamboozle a senior citizen like me what will they do to you? You need to think about this before casting your vote.
John E. Stockton
"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing."
My name is John E. Stockton and I am a resident of San Jacinto County, Texas. I would like to tell you of my experience with Judge C.T. (Rusty) Hight and his 75th District Court of Liberty County, Texas.
In September 2003 I was sued in the 75th District Court in Liberty County by the law firm of Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson, with Judge C.T. Hight presiding. Before the trial Judge Hight said he was considering recusing himself from the trial because of his relationship with E.R. (Ed) Norwood, one of the lawyers for the firm. Unfortunately for me Judge Hight did not recuse himself. He and Ed Norwood are life-long friends, having attended the same grade school, high school and college. During the trial a lawyer in the courtroom asked Judge Hight how he likes being judge. Judge Hight replied, I was two or three years away from being ready but I ran for judge to get it before some Republican got appointed.
I was sued for not paying attorney fees from a law suit in which I was the plaintiff and Ed Norwood was my attorney. In that suit I was quoted a fee of $25,000 t0 $30,000 by Ed Norwood for representation by his firm. After the trial I was billed for approximately $400,000, more than ten times what I was quoted. The judge, C.T., E.R. Norwood and other lawyers involved knew that I was in my seventies, living on social security and had very little cash. In a hearing before the trial Judge Hight took away my rights by not allowing me to ask for attorney fees or seek damages, such as deceptive trade practice, for having been charged many times the fee quoted by Ed Norwood.
Although I live in San Jacinto County, Judge Hight would not allow the trial to be in my home county. If he had allowed the trial to be in San Jacinto County, taxpayers in Liberty County would have saved a lot of money, but he would not have been able to help his friend, Ed Norwood. In a hearing before the trial Judge Hight said, “I believe in a lawyer getting all he’s got coming”.
During the trial it was brought out that I had been illegally charged over $62,000 for the services of David Ripkowski, a paralegal for the firm Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson. The firm was paying Mr. Ripkowski around $20 per hour for his services but charging me $90 an hour for his services-more than three times the cost. When it was determined in trial this could not be allowed, Judge Hight told Ed Norwood, “Don’t worry Ed; I’ll see that you get your money”. And he did.
Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson hired another lawyer named Mike Johnston, for a fee of $325 an hour, who also attended the same grade school, high school and law school as Judge Hight and Ed Norwood. Mr. Johnson, E.R. Norwood, Michael Sanders and Scott Camp all were untruthful during the trial and misled the jury. (Martha Stewart went to jail for being untruthful) Judge C.T. Hight knew these lawyers were not telling the truth and yet he did nothing about it. (Perjury)
E.R. Norwood told me before he could get anything he wanted in the 75th District court, saying that it was his “turf”. The jury did NOT award Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson what they sought in the trial. Approximately two weeks after the trial Judge C. T. Hight overturned the jury’s decision and awarded the firm many thousands of dollars-money that I did not have. Being in my 70’s and living on Social Security, I had to sell my best cows and the best part of my ranch to pay over $300,000 to Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson even though they had quoted me $25,000 to $30,000. It is no wonder judges and lawyers are concerned about their safety.
Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson charged thousands of dollars to my bill for Ed Norwood attending a board of directors meeting the firm held in Midland, TX. This certainly was not discussed with me nor approved by me, but I still had to pay for it because Judge C. T. Hight believes a lawyer should get everything he’s got coming. It is my experience and my opinion that some judges and the Texas Bar Association protect greedy, dishonest lawyers and assist them in taking from the honest and the elderly. If I lived in Liberty County I would not serve jury duty in a courtroom over which Judge C.T. Hight presided.
As of now, October 2010, I have not collect one cent on what Ed Norwood and Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe and Dawson claim they won in trial for me, yet I have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees for it.
If Judge Hight and his cronies will bamboozle a senior citizen like me what will they do to you? You need to think about this before casting your vote.
John E. Stockton
"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing."
JUDGE HIGHT: LIBERAL IN COURT, CONSERVATIVE AT HOME?
 |
| Hight, Democrat Liberal Puppet |
Liberty County voter alert! Judge Rusty Hight has now publicly stated his definition of a “conservative” and let me tell you it is everything we should have expected him to say. Or should I say it was everything most of us expected him to hope voters would think? He says he is a “conservative”! But for us voters, Hight left a great many things out of his definition. In fact, I am sure he did not offend one liberal with his definition.
To be real specific and cut to the point, Hight did not talk about being a “conservative” in the way he handles the business of the courtroom. Instead, Hight wants voters to redefine “conservative”. He wants us to take his word for what an honorable personal life he has lead and then call that “conservative”. But don’t we want to hear his response to people talking about his sweetheart deals for certain lawyers and convicted criminals? Don’t we want him to explain his Christmas furloughs for certain prisoners? Perhaps this new and unique definition of a “conservative” is a calculated answer to steer away from his longtime advocacy of the Democratic Party and liberal Democrats. Typical of a politician who smiles and promotes himself publicly, Hight wants us to focus on the image he has prepared for us. Not on his track record in politics and his liberal handling of criminals.
Hight asks voters to be hopelessly ignorant when he answers questions about his view of who he thinks has run the state well or the country well. Hight has told us: “ I have not supported anyone for Governor or anyone for President”. His opponent, Mark Morefield, has responded quite differently (and more honestly) by saying he believes Ronald Reagan lead this country well and he names Coke Stevenson, Bill Clements, and George W. Bush as good Governors of Texas. Hight is asking voters to who have lived in this county and who know his brother-in-law was the Democratic party Chairman and that he and the Zbranek family have been the people Ann Richards, Bill Clinton, and Senator Barack Obama would have been told to contact if they planned on going through Liberty County – their allies in their liberal cause.
In his closing sales pitch Hight says this election is not about those people he is has decades of political links to, he says it is about experience and all he asks is that voters be fair to him. Now is he talking about the experience, the wonderful “freeing” experience that Liberty Dispatch has posted small samplings of? The “experience” voters should be aware of concerning Judge Hight is a consistent one. He has supported liberal Democrats and he has acted like one. He is tough on crime occasionally, but Liberty Dispatch could not even post all of the unbelievable sentences Hight has handed out to convicted criminals... and the indefensible acts of waiting one day to unharness these dangerous people on us from their probation.
LOCAL MEDIA LAP DOGS NOT WATCH DOGS
Brashier and Buchanan: "Two Peas in a Pod"
The local media continue to be lapdogs for most of the Democrats despite the results of the last election and the last two primaries which have indicated a significant shift toward the Republican Party by the people who keep them in business. Vanessa Brashier, a former employee of The Liberty Vindicator and now the editor of The Dayton News and The Cleveland Advocate, and part owner of KSHN radio, Bill Buchanan, are two peas in a pod. They have been pushing voters to vote for Democrats from the first day they hit the first letter on their respective typewriters for a media outlet. This article will give a much different account of the last forum Brashier reported on.
Vanessa Brashier appears to think she discovered some kind of 'smoking gun' to help the struggling campaign of Rusty Hight when she makes a big deal about Hight’s opponent having to be stopped after going over the allotted time. But isn’t the buzzer having to be rung on someone in a debate over who gets to be the District Judge for the next four years indicative of someone who has a vast wealth of knowledge in all areas of the law and the history of this country who is trying to fully answer a three part question? Isn’t Brashier’s “smoking gun” more of an indictment against her and her own bias in Liberty politics?
If Brashier is a watchdog like the people who founded this country and signed the Bill of Rights envisioned the press being wouldn’t she report the differences in what Hight said and what she should know he does in the courtroom? Many statements made by Rusty Hight were either deceptions or complete untruths such as:
In Hight’s opening statement he tried to distance himself from the Democrat party by saying that he was part of the Judicial Branch so if you are mad at the Government, don't be mad at him because he has nothing to do with it. UUGGHH!!! If Vanessa Brashier hasn’t been asleep the entire time she has lived in Liberty County she would know that Rusty Hight, his brother-in-law Zeke Zbranek, and his two nephews, Zeb and Zack, have all been standard bearers for the Democratic Party...big time supporters of the left leaning candidates, past and present, nominated by the Democratic Party. It is deceptive and not very loyal to desert a lifetime of work in his party just because (for the first time in Liberty County) being a Democrat may not be popular with this community. Shouldn’t Brashier have pointed this out – and in all fairness pointed out Mark Morefield is a long time Republican.
When asked about "morals clauses", Hight said he requires morals clauses to be in every divorce or custody order involving minor children. This is completely untrue. Ask any attorney in town how many times they have heard him say that no one has any morals and he is going to refuse to even put it in any order. He also said he refuses to allow a parent to have any person whom they have an intimate relationship with to be in the presence of the children between the hours of 8:00 p.m. until 9:00 a.m. He has denied these kinds of request and made it later in the night.
When there was a question about religion and the role it plays in the courtroom, Mark Morefield responded first and received an immediate, overwhelming applause. Rusty responded and Mark rebutted saying "It is the Democrats who are trying to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance, In God We Trust out of our money", etc. If Rusty wants to position himself with voters as a warrior for Christ, shouldn’t he be outspoken towards his own party and issues like abortion, school prayer, or these other things Morefield has championed?
The next question was related to lawsuit abuse and Morefield answered with statistics and examples. Rusty Hight responded by discussing a commercial on television with people lined up outside a courthouse who were trying to get in but couldn't due to lawsuit abuse. Then he asked everyone when was the last time they drove by the Court house and saw people lined up outside. He answered his own question with, "Never". He continued by stating, “There is no lawsuit abuse”. Did Hight not realize the commercial is a metaphor, not a realistic portrayal? Does he know his assertion that he is a conservative begins to crumble with this kind of talk? People are tired of how much things cost because of lawsuit abuse! Shouldn’t Brashier be familiar enough with conservatism to ask about this and other departures from what conservatives believe?
Would Brashier have pointed out that Hight’s campaign finance report looks like few conservatives and that it is trial attorneys and PI firms who are contributing to him if Morefield had not brought it up? Hight's response was, "who better to pick the best judge...lawyers or people who don't know any better?" Could it be that lawyers are contributing to the Hight campaign because they all want Hight to remember their help when they appear before him? Hight has made it clear that he intends to seek retribution from people who support Morefield.
Hight in some of his comments sounded a great deal like some of the “rumors” that he denies are coming out of his campaign. Is that coincidence? Shouldn’t Vanessa Brashier ask about the rumors? If Hight continues to say he knows nothing about them, shouldn’t Brashier point out the amazing coincidences in his rhetoric?
Vanessa Brashier is not a watchdog. Some of the corruption that has been revealed publicly by officials has eventually been reported by Brashier, but Republicans have gotten as much negative from her as Democrats and until recently there had been no Republican officeholders for 100 years. Is that equal treatment? Is that a watchdog looking out for the community? Or is that a lap dog, Vaness. waiting to do what the powerful people in the courthouse tell you to do?
Let’s unchain Vanessa Brashier and Bill Buchanan from their roles as lapdogs and vote their masters out of office. Maybe then they will report these meetings more fairly and balanced.
LD Comment: We doubt either one of these profit motivated news outlets will ever do the right thing for the Republican Party...
Democrat Judge Candidate CT Hight Goes Shopping
 |
| Justice for Sale in Hight's Liberty County 75th Court? |
One campaign contributor is Allen Youngblood's (i-dineout) attorney, Gerald Hoseman along with a host of other local attorneys. Because of an alleged quid pro quo with Hight's renters and (Wednesday court) justice for sale, contributions from local Liberty County Attorneys into Hight's campaign could call into question those attorney's individual motives and ethics.
As for expenditures, queerly we see payments to Macy's in Baytown and The Vineyard in Dayton, Texas.
Note on Hight's campaign report there is a contribution from "Vision Ministry" located at 1829 Sam Houston St., Liberty TX 77575. This address is the 'City of Liberty'.
Curiously, Hight's campaign consultant payments are not included in his candidate expense report- this begs the question...
What campaign expenditures is Hight hiding from the Texas Ethics Commission and the people of Liberty County?
Answer: Business as usual for a corrupt public official...
Hight's Campaign Finance Report Link
CHAMBERS COUNTY WRITE-IN CANDIDATE
PRESS RELEASE
Sue Troxell (R)Write-in Candidate For Chambers County Judge
Yes Chambers County voters you do have a choice for your next Chambers County Judge write-candidate Sue Troxell. Candidate Troxell is married to Kenneth Troxell and lives on a ranch in western Chambers County where they raise cattle, horses and honeybees.
Sue Troxell graduated from Texas A&M University in 1984 with a B.S. in Agricultural Economics. She work at Fulbright & Jaworski as well as the federal courts for a U.S. Magistrate, serving each as a legal administrator.
Her opponent on the ballot is incumbent County Judge Jimmy Sylvia who is currently under federal investigation for his handling of FEMA resources after Hurricane Ike. Sue is running because many in Chambers County are demanding a choice and Sue is going to offer that choice.
LD NOTE: Due to the short time before early voting begins we will be doing follow-up stories outlining the difference between these two candidates.
HIGHT AND COMPANY "Circling the Wagons"
Do you remember who said the following quote? “There is not a conservative America and a liberal America”. If you said Barack Obama and remembered that was the beginning of a strategy to convince many people who do not ascribe to the liberal philosophy of governing to vote for him in the 2008 election, you are correct.
You would think convincing voters that a candidate is a liberal is not difficult when they have a track record. Obama had a track record. His time as a State Senator Illinois 13th district and his time as a U.S. Senator include plenty of evidence he is a liberal. Spend, spend, spend, tax, tax, tax! But that is what democrat need to do in many areas of the country and they are surprisingly cunning at doing it.
Now we have Judge Rusty Hight trying to do the same as Obama. He is distancing himself from the Democratic Party he has been so vocal about for years and trying to change the record he has established as a judge and a lawyer. Like Obama, he stands up before crowds and says whatever sounds conservative: “I have sent 900 people to jail as Judge”, he says. With the usual cast of media characters chiming in and still thinking that if they repeat something enough, voters will believe it. “Hight is a conservative,” says Vanessa Brashier (editor of The Cleveland Advocate and The Dayton News and an admitted Democrat). “He deserves to be re-elected” says the liberal radio broadcaster who has gone so far in his dedication to the Democrats that he defended people like Judge Hight’s good friend, Democrat Phil Fitzgerald.
You would think convincing voters that a candidate is a liberal is not difficult when they have a track record. Obama had a track record. His time as a State Senator Illinois 13th district and his time as a U.S. Senator include plenty of evidence he is a liberal. Spend, spend, spend, tax, tax, tax! But that is what democrat need to do in many areas of the country and they are surprisingly cunning at doing it.
Now we have Judge Rusty Hight trying to do the same as Obama. He is distancing himself from the Democratic Party he has been so vocal about for years and trying to change the record he has established as a judge and a lawyer. Like Obama, he stands up before crowds and says whatever sounds conservative: “I have sent 900 people to jail as Judge”, he says. With the usual cast of media characters chiming in and still thinking that if they repeat something enough, voters will believe it. “Hight is a conservative,” says Vanessa Brashier (editor of The Cleveland Advocate and The Dayton News and an admitted Democrat). “He deserves to be re-elected” says the liberal radio broadcaster who has gone so far in his dedication to the Democrats that he defended people like Judge Hight’s good friend, Democrat Phil Fitzgerald.
Judge Rusty Hight Loves Murderers and Hates Republicans
Please post my attached comment heading and comment.
I am now sending you the fifteenth case showing how Judge Rusty Hight is no conservative, but in fact, he is a friend to convicted criminals. His heart may have a soft spot for felons but the soft spot liberals have in their heads is when they fail to realize they are not protecting the citizens who vote them in office.
Here is the last case I will send you. I hope you have the good sense to post it. All of your readers can verify the facts by looking up the cause numbers. PLEASE POST THIS:
Amanda Rodriguez, Cause No. CR25850, 75th District Judge Rusty Hight
Indicted for Murder and Aggravated Assault on July 6, 2005
Judgment, April 4, 2008
Guilty of Murder, 1st Degree Felony
Sentence: 10 YEARS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION (which means no formal finding of guilt and she is entitled to an expunction and/or non-disclosure)
$277 Court Cost, $500 Fine, $4000 Attorney Fees and 320 Hours Community Services
Guilty of murder in the first degree and deferred adjudication! I guess Hight can claim this is not like the other fifteen I sent you. It may have nothing to do with a liberal mindset, being easy on criminals or maybe sexual favors. Why else would Judge Hight let this pretty black widow off from a murder charge?
I am now sending you the fifteenth case showing how Judge Rusty Hight is no conservative, but in fact, he is a friend to convicted criminals. His heart may have a soft spot for felons but the soft spot liberals have in their heads is when they fail to realize they are not protecting the citizens who vote them in office.
Here is the last case I will send you. I hope you have the good sense to post it. All of your readers can verify the facts by looking up the cause numbers. PLEASE POST THIS:
Amanda Rodriguez, Cause No. CR25850, 75th District Judge Rusty Hight
Indicted for Murder and Aggravated Assault on July 6, 2005
Judgment, April 4, 2008
Guilty of Murder, 1st Degree Felony
Sentence: 10 YEARS DEFERRED ADJUDICATION (which means no formal finding of guilt and she is entitled to an expunction and/or non-disclosure)
$277 Court Cost, $500 Fine, $4000 Attorney Fees and 320 Hours Community Services
Guilty of murder in the first degree and deferred adjudication! I guess Hight can claim this is not like the other fifteen I sent you. It may have nothing to do with a liberal mindset, being easy on criminals or maybe sexual favors. Why else would Judge Hight let this pretty black widow off from a murder charge?
Dear Mr. Akins
Mr. Akins, I read this and thought about you. Some will say it is too dramatic for the current situation, but I believe every person facing the struggles of the times they live in deserves their just do. I have read how they attacked you as a Republican, Private Investigator from your arrival. I have read how you have been firm in your resolve to expose corruption here in Liberty County no matter how you are threatened by those trying to hold on to power. I have read how even though you are dragged up in court before these people that you continue to gather information that will eventually unravel the mess we have in our courthouse.
What I read that reminds me of you was part of the December 23, 1776 printing of “The Crisis” by Thomas Paine. Here it is:
“THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.”
Our Founding Fathers were men hunted down by The Authorities because they dared to stand up and be counted. For all of their accusations and actions, they had a hangman’s noose awaiting them if they lost.. Two thirds of the colonists did not support their efforts, but we all enjoy the fruits of their victory. Some of those who should actually be doing something to help because they know corruption needs to be uprooted, even dare question your methods – like that is their contribution.
Like others have expressed, you have my prayers and my vote will be, of course, to free this country from Obama and this county from his base support.
What I read that reminds me of you was part of the December 23, 1776 printing of “The Crisis” by Thomas Paine. Here it is:
“THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.”
Our Founding Fathers were men hunted down by The Authorities because they dared to stand up and be counted. For all of their accusations and actions, they had a hangman’s noose awaiting them if they lost.. Two thirds of the colonists did not support their efforts, but we all enjoy the fruits of their victory. Some of those who should actually be doing something to help because they know corruption needs to be uprooted, even dare question your methods – like that is their contribution.
Like others have expressed, you have my prayers and my vote will be, of course, to free this country from Obama and this county from his base support.
DEMOCRATS ATTACK RATHER THAN REBUTT
In March 2004, when Barack Obama was a candidate for the U.S. Senate in the Illinois Democratic primary, he excoriated President George W. Bush for creating a "jobless recovery." The month he said that, 334,000 new jobs were created—none of them temporary census jobs—and unemployment was 5.8%.
That was then. This...is now. The unemployment rate is 9.6%, and jobs reports are unlikely to be much better for awhile because this President (the one who was so critical of Bush) is doing a poor job. While people were trying to point out how inexperienced Obama was and how what little experience he had showed little knowledge of economics or foreign policy or much of anything else, Obama was demonizing Bush. His rebuttals to this day are to attack everyone who criticizes him. Most people in Liberty County know it. Obama’s idea of spending our way out of economic trouble is just plain stupid.
Here on Liberty Dispatch we have talked a great deal about what the worst of the local Democratic officeholders have done when they were supposed to be performing their duties. We have documented a great deal of it. We have heard the pitiful defense of those who are not doing their job. Their defense is basically a two prong strategy. They have denied the documents that corroborate what we have said are authentic. We have posted copies with document numbers and page numbers leaving no doubt as to the facts.
For over two years they have attacked and even tried to imprison Liberty Dispatch Editor Ray Akins in an effort to shut up his over five years of criticism and investigation of the corruption in the courthouse. Unfortunately for them, their attempts to discredit him do not speak to the validity of the stories written on Liberty Dispatch. A review of this year indicates, Akins has written less than 15% of the articles posted. The attempts of some in the local media and the Democratic officeholders who are wrapped up in self dealing corruption to smear the facts written on Liberty Dispatch have missed entirely. Documented facts included in articles written by several law abiding concerned citizens continue to go unchallenged.
The reason they will go unchallenged and the reason they attack and smear and try even to imprison the messengers is because if the facts continue to be revealed only family and close friends would vote to re-elect these people.
That was then. This...is now. The unemployment rate is 9.6%, and jobs reports are unlikely to be much better for awhile because this President (the one who was so critical of Bush) is doing a poor job. While people were trying to point out how inexperienced Obama was and how what little experience he had showed little knowledge of economics or foreign policy or much of anything else, Obama was demonizing Bush. His rebuttals to this day are to attack everyone who criticizes him. Most people in Liberty County know it. Obama’s idea of spending our way out of economic trouble is just plain stupid.
Here on Liberty Dispatch we have talked a great deal about what the worst of the local Democratic officeholders have done when they were supposed to be performing their duties. We have documented a great deal of it. We have heard the pitiful defense of those who are not doing their job. Their defense is basically a two prong strategy. They have denied the documents that corroborate what we have said are authentic. We have posted copies with document numbers and page numbers leaving no doubt as to the facts.
For over two years they have attacked and even tried to imprison Liberty Dispatch Editor Ray Akins in an effort to shut up his over five years of criticism and investigation of the corruption in the courthouse. Unfortunately for them, their attempts to discredit him do not speak to the validity of the stories written on Liberty Dispatch. A review of this year indicates, Akins has written less than 15% of the articles posted. The attempts of some in the local media and the Democratic officeholders who are wrapped up in self dealing corruption to smear the facts written on Liberty Dispatch have missed entirely. Documented facts included in articles written by several law abiding concerned citizens continue to go unchallenged.
The reason they will go unchallenged and the reason they attack and smear and try even to imprison the messengers is because if the facts continue to be revealed only family and close friends would vote to re-elect these people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
